Investigating the relationship between environmental disclosure and tax behaviors of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

Document Type : Original Article


1 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 M.A. Student in Accounting, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran


This study examines the strategic relationship between two key elements of corporate social responsibility, namely tax behavior and environmental performance. The tax provides the resources needed by the government and ostensibly reduces shareholder wealth. Corporate strategies may balance the interests of such incompatible stakeholders through compromising between corporate social responsibility elements. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between disclosure of legal and voluntary environmental performance of companies and tax behavior of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The research data collected from 110 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2018. In order to analyse composite data (data panel), a regression model with fixed effect is used. In this empirical study, there is no evidence of a compromise between corporate tax evasion and disclosure of environmental legal performance. However, the positive relationship between tax avoidance and voluntary disclosure suggests that strategic compromise to occur in order to provide an acceptable level of satisfaction for various stakeholders. The results of this research are consistent with the theory of multidimensional legitimacy.


Main Subjects

Adams, C., & Whelan, G. (2009). Conseptualising future change in corporate sustainability reporting. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(1), 118-143.
Aldrich, H; Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. NewYork: Harper&Row.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95, 41-61.
Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
Claydon, J. (2011). A New Direction for Csr: The Shortcomings of Previous Csr Models and the Rationale for a New Model. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 405-420.
COMMUNITIES, C. O. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development. Brussels.
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal,16, 312-322.
Ding, H., Li, S., Liu, T., & Liu, B. (2014). Literature Survey of Research on Environmental Accounting: Theoretical Review and Prospect. International Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 2, No. 1, 13-25.
Dowling, G. (2014). The Curious Case of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Is it Socially Irresponsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 173-184.
Fallan, E., & Fallan, L. (2019). Corporate tax behaviour and environmental disclosure: Strategic trade-offs across elements of CSR? Scandinavian Journal of Management ,35, 1-15.
Farny, O., Franz, M., Gerhartinger, P., Lunzer, G., & Neuwirh, M. (2015). TAX AVOIDANCE, TAX EVASION AND TAX HAVENS.
Fifka, M. S. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective - a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 1-35.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Press.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times32 13..
Hardeck, I. (2012). Die Bedeutung von Steuern in der Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung: Eine international vergleichende empirische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft,82, 126-141.
Haron, H. M., Hamidu, A. A., & Amran, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review on Definitions, Core Characteristics and Theoretical Perspectives. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 83-95.
Hasseldine, J., & Morris, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: A comment and reflection. Accounting Forum, 37, 1-14.
Huang, X., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature,34, 1-16.
Huseynov, F., & Klamm, B. K. (2012). Tax avoidance, tax management and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18, 804-827.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Johansen, T. R. (2016). EU regulation of corporate social and environmental reporting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 36(1), 1-9.
Johnson, H. L. (1971). Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues. Belmont: CA: Wadsworth.
Jones, M. J. (2010). Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting. Accounting Forum 34, 123-138.
Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 59-67.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Prospect theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Laguir, I., Stagliano, R., & Elbaz, J. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax agressiveness? Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 665-675.
Landry, S., Deslandes, M., & Fortin, A. (2013). Tax agressivenss, corporate social responsibility and ownership structure. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy,14(3), 611-645.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31, 86-108.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75-100.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance? Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 439-457.
LENKAUSKAS, E. (2013). The Borderlines between the Concept of Tax Avoidance and the Other Similar Concepts. Available at SSRN:
Lindblom, C. K. (2010). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. In R. Gray, J. Bebbington, & S. Gray (Eds.). Social and environmental accountingLondon:, SAGE 2, 51-63.
Minton, S., Dobiyanski, A., & Lee, B. B. (2015). Theories and Empirical Proxies for Corporate Tax Avoidance. Journal of Applied Business and Economics Vol. 17(3), 21-34.
Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2015). Responsible tax as corporate social responsibility: The case of multinational enterprises and effective tax in India. Business and Society, 54(4), 435-463.
Negash, M. (2012). IFRS and environmental accounting. Management Research Review Vol. 35 No. 7, 577-601.
Patel, S., & Col, B. (2016). Going to Haven? Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Avoidance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, 1033-1050.
Preuss, L. (2012). Responsibility in Paradise? The adoption of CSR tools by companies domiciled in tax havens. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 1-14.
Ravnaas, E. (1986). Skatteplanlegging for næringsdrivende. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Sikka, P. (2010). Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Accounting Forum, 153-168.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, tax avoidance, and earnings performance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37(2), 1-21.
Ylönen, M., & Laine, M. (2015). For logistical reasons only? A case study of tax planning and corporate social responsibility reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 5-23.
Yudoko, G., Krisnawati, A., & Bangun, Y. R. (2013). DEVELOPMENT PATH OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY THEORIES. International Conference on Innovation Challenges in Multidisciplinary Research & Practice, (pp. 54-59). Kuala Lumpur.